Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search

    11.7 VST stats bug fix

    Chit Chat
    2
    4
    2307
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Rob Fitzpatrick
      Rob Fitzpatrick last edited by

      Rich's presentation on what's new in 11.7 contained this tidbit, with reference to _*stat:
      "OE 11.7.0 fixed VSI for base != 1"

      Rereading that presentation recently, I'm wondering how much of my VST code is now broken. I didn't know until 2017 that that behaviour was a bug. Just wondering aloud; I'm not expecting anyone else to answer that. 😉

      For example:
      proserve sports -basetable -1 -tablerangesize 4
      find _tablestat where _tablestat-id = -1.
      display _tablestat-id.

      11.6 (and below) result:
      ** _TableStat record not on file. (138)

      11.7 result:
      -1

      Just curious whether PT will need to change to deal with that in 11.7+.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Rob Fitzpatrick
        Rob Fitzpatrick last edited by

        In a similar vein (though this is a new feature, not a bug fix), we have new stats params:

        baseusertable
        baseuserindex
        usertablerangesize
        userindexrangesize

        I haven't played with these yet, or even thought about them too much. Just curious if anyone else has.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • tom
          tom administrators last edited by

          I'm not a big fan of limiting the _user*stats. I sort of understand why they did it but I'm not terribly anxious to see anyone use it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tom
            tom administrators last edited by

            Except for a few weirdos base = 1 is kind of the norm 😉

            (I do understand your use case -- I do that too although probably less often than you seem to. But it is helpful to verify that ProTop is behaving as expected.)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post