Navigation

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search

    Case sensitivity issue with AppServer/Webspeed brokers.

    ~~Bugs~~
    2
    4
    2166
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jdpjamesp
      jdpjamesp last edited by

      I know it's bad design, but... ๐Ÿ™‚

      We have an AppServer called esd_test and a Webspeed broker called ESD_Test. This works great, despite being a terrible idea. But, ProTop has a bit of a problem with it. See below from pt3agent.appsrv.debug. asbman and wtbman are able to differentiate these on case.

      [18/10/22@23:24:40.061+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- Logging level set to = 1
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- ** tt_apsvList gibt es schon mit "ESD_Test". (132)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- ** ABL Debug-Alert Stack Trace **
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- --> chkConfig dc\apsv.p at line 800 (.\dc\apsv.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- mon-init dc\apsv.p at line 899 (.\dc\apsv.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- dcLaunch lib/ptsrv.p at line 198 (.\lib\ptsrv.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- clientLaunch lib/ptsrv.p at line 241 (.\lib\ptsrv.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- doRequest lib/ptsrv.p at line 481 (.\lib\ptsrv.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- makeRequest util\pt3agent.p at line 387 (.\util\pt3agent.r)
      [18/10/22@23:24:40.197+0200] P-002656 T-006120 1 4GL -- util\pt3agent.p at line 1640 (.\util\pt3agent.r)

      tom 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • tom
        tom administrators @jdpjamesp last edited by

        @jdpjamesp you are right, thatโ€™s bad design.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jdpjamesp
          jdpjamesp last edited by

          But bad error handling probably doesn't help... ๐Ÿ˜‰

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tom
            tom administrators last edited by

            Zing!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post